The debate over supplying Ukraine with Tomahawk cruise missiles is heating up politicians and public opinion on both sides of the Atlantic. For some, it’s a logical step in defending an invaded nation and a signal that the West will not back down in the face of Russian blackmail. For others, it’s playing with fire that could turn into a global conflict. The facts are that Tomahawks have a range capable of reaching almost any target in Russia, raising concerns about escalation. Is this the defense of freedom or dangerous boundary-testing in a proxy war? The U.S. has already “unofficially” tested similar scenarios—will it cross the Rubicon this time? Take part in the poll and judge for yourself.
Tomahawks for Ukraine

Should the United States provide Ukraine with Tomahawk cruise missiles?
22/10/2025
agriculture children china conspiracy theories consumption crime cuisine culture demography disasters energy entrepreneurship equality eu family geopolitics germany infrastructure international relations israel labor market migration moral values poland psychology public finance real estate resources russia security social care society transport ukraine usa weather
Have a question for society?
Create your own poll and discover what others think!
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.