Tag: weather

Weather covers surveys on atmospheric events, climate variation, perceived impacts of extreme conditions and their effects on daily life. This category examines views on public and institutional preparedness.

Historical ozone hole and UV radiation
Do you think the threat associated with the ozone hole and UV radiation was exaggerated by the media?

Yes - it was an environmental panic. The ozone hole issue served as a pretext to introduce new regulations and boost sales of “UV filter” products, while cheap freons were replaced with more expensive substitutes
No - the threat was real. Limiting the emission of freons helped stop the destruction of the ozone layer, and sunglasses with UV filters as well as protective creams actually reduce the risk of skin and eye damage
The ozone hole was one of the biggest media scare stories of the late 20th century. For years, there was talk of burns, skin cancer, and the end of life on Earth – yet today the topic has almost disappeared from the headlines. Is that proof that international actions truly worked, or rather that the whole phenomenon was deliberately exaggerated to push through costly regulations and create new markets for “eco-friendly” products? Many believe that the chemical and cosmetics lobbies profited the most from this global panic. And you – do you believe in a miracle of atmospheric recovery or in clever manipulation?
09/10/2025
Forced global warming – is it worth reducing emissions?
Do you think reducing greenhouse gas emissions makes sense, given that even after a complete halt in emissions, Earth’s temperature will remain elevated for hundreds of years (the so-called “forced global warming”)?

Partly yes - emission reduction is necessary, but technology for removing CO₂ from the atmosphere is essential.
No - warming will continue for hundreds of years anyway, and the narrative about emissions is just a pretext for taxes and control over societies, while natural cycles play the key role
Yes - the sooner we reduce emissions, the smaller the damage and the lower the risk of irreversible climate change in the future
Forced global warming is a concept fueling debate about whether fighting greenhouse gas emissions makes sense. Since even a total stop in emissions won’t halt rising temperatures for centuries, many wonder if reductions are meaningful or merely tools for politicians and corporations. Some argue that every cut lowers the risk of irreversible climate disasters and glacier melt, others point to the need for CO₂ removal technologies. Conspiracy theories increasingly claim the emissions narrative is only about imposing new taxes and global control. Are we really fighting for the climate, or for power over people?
30/08/2025
Weather Control
Do you believe that humans intentionally influence the weather or climate?

I don't know / I'm not sure
No, these are just conspiracy theories with no scientific basis
Yes, there are secret programs (e.g. HAARP, chemtrails) that affect the weather on a global scale
Yes, there are technologies for local weather modification (e.g. silver iodide)
Is the weather still nature’s doing—or already shaped by human hands? In an era of extreme climate events, some believe it’s not just CO₂ emissions at play, but deliberate manipulation of the atmosphere. From theories about chemtrails and the HAARP program to real experiments with cloud seeding, the line between science and conspiracy blurs. Are we witnessing secret global tests kept out of the spotlight? Or is this just our way of seeking someone to blame? See what others really think—and share your own view.
30/07/2025

OTHER POLLS

Have a question for society?
Create your own poll and discover what others think!

Home (English)