Contraception has long sparked emotions and divided society between those who support modern methods and those who prefer nature. The intrauterine device and the “morning-after pill” are accused of having an early abortive effect, which leads to heated ethical and religious disputes. Hormonal pills, patches, or implants are considered effective and convenient, but critics point to side effects and pressure from the pharmaceutical industry. Condoms or vasectomy are regarded as safer, though still surrounded by taboo. Meanwhile, natural methods such as the calendar method or withdrawal are viewed by doctors with skepticism, but for many people they carry a moral dimension and a sense of “purity.” Is contraception an expression of freedom, or rather an interference with the laws of nature?
Tag: society
Society covers surveys on attitudes, values, social relations and broader changes affecting everyday life. This category examines views on social trust, lifestyles and community development.
-
Your organs after death – a gift of life or an ethical boundary?

-
Harvesting organs after brain death – saving lives or an ethical abuse?

-
Organ transplants and cellular memory

-
Wealth and prosperity vs fertility – a natural correlation or the result of manipulation?

-
Digital money instead of cash – the future of finance or a tool of control?

