eu – poll4all.org

Should politicians take part in closed-door meetings of the Bilderberg Group?

Should politicians take part in closed-door meetings of the Bilderberg Group?

How, in your opinion, should the annual meetings of the Bilderberg Group, attended by elites from politics, finance, and business, be evaluated?

For decades, the Bilderberg Group has stirred emotions – some see it as an exclusive club of elites discussing the future of the world, others – as a secret center of power above nations. The meetings take place behind closed doors, without media or official records, which only fuels suspicions of backroom deals. Supporters claim it is a forum for free exchange of ideas, while critics argue it’s where bankers and politicians decide global economic and social strategies. The Internet is full of theories linking Bilderberg to the New World Order or global political control. Is it an innocent debate of elites, or the real command center steering the world from behind the scenes?

05/11/2025

US sanctions on Venezuela – aid, pressure, or self-interest?

In your opinion, the economic sanctions imposed by the United States on Venezuela are mainly intended to:

U.S. economic sanctions against Venezuela have sparked heated debate for years – some see them as an attempt to defend democracy, others as a brutal tool of economic pressure. Officially, they aim to support the fight against Nicolás Maduro’s authoritarian regime, yet many now question whether the real goal is oil, geopolitics, and control over South America. Venezuela, with some of the world’s largest oil reserves, has long been a battleground for influence between the U.S., Russia, China, and Iran. Critics argue that sanctions mostly hurt ordinary citizens rather than the ruling elite. So is it really about human rights – or about maintaining dollar dominance and control over resources?

26/10/2025

Time change

Do you think we should abolish daylight saving time?

If we were to permanently stick to one time, which do you think would be better for people and the economy?

For years, the issue of abolishing time changes has sparked huge controversy. Some argue it’s a relic of a bygone era – invented to save energy, though its purpose has long since faded. Others defend it stubbornly, citing “more sun after work” and its supposed impact on mood. Meanwhile, more and more studies show that changing the clocks disrupts the biological rhythm, increases the risk of heart attacks, and worsens sleep. Yet politicians continue to delay a decision, and the European Union cannot reach an agreement. Is daylight saving time an innocent tradition or a health experiment that has long spiraled out of control? Take part in the poll and decide!

25/10/2025

Frozen Russian Assets

Is freezing Russian assets abroad and potentially using them for Ukraine’s reconstruction the right course of action?

The freezing of Russian assets abroad and the idea of using them for Ukraine’s reconstruction have stirred strong emotions in politics and economics. Supporters argue it is a moral obligation toward the victims of the war and a way for Russia to pay for the destruction it caused. Opponents warn, however, that such actions could open Pandora’s box – if Russia’s property can be seized today, other countries that fall out of favor with the West could face the same tomorrow. Some even call it a hidden form of economic warfare, while others see it as a prelude to a global redistribution of elite wealth. Is this the beginning of a new financial order or a step toward chaos?

23/10/2025

Tomahawks for Ukraine

Should the United States provide Ukraine with Tomahawk cruise missiles?

The debate over supplying Ukraine with Tomahawk cruise missiles is heating up politicians and public opinion on both sides of the Atlantic. For some, it’s a logical step in defending an invaded nation and a signal that the West will not back down in the face of Russian blackmail. For others, it’s playing with fire that could turn into a global conflict. The facts are that Tomahawks have a range capable of reaching almost any target in Russia, raising concerns about escalation. Is this the defense of freedom or dangerous boundary-testing in a proxy war? The U.S. has already “unofficially” tested similar scenarios—will it cross the Rubicon this time? Take part in the poll and judge for yourself.

22/10/2025

Explosions at refineries in Hungary and Romania

How do you think the simultaneous explosions at the MOL (Hungary) and Lukoil (Romania) refineries should be interpreted?

The simultaneous explosions at the MOL refinery in Hungary and the Lukoil refinery in Romania have sparked a wave of speculation unseen in Central Europe for a long time. Official versions speak of technical failures and human errors, but many note that such “coincidences” are rarely truly accidental. In the background looms geopolitics – the war in Ukraine, tensions within NATO, and Europe’s energy dependence on Russia. Is this a warning sent by the Kremlin, Ukrainian sabotage, or perhaps a provocation meant to maintain the narrative of a “threat from the East”? Opinions are extreme, and emotions are running high. What’s your view? Take part in the poll and judge who might really have benefited.