Natural family planning has long sparked heated debates because it touches the very heart of Catholic sexual morality. On one hand, the Church teaches that every marital act must remain open to life, which for many means that avoiding intercourse during fertile days is a form of hidden contraception. Critics even argue that NFP is the “Catholic version of the condom” – playing with God and trying to cheat nature. On the other hand, official teaching, especially the encyclical Humanae vitae, emphasizes that NFP is not a sin because it uses neither artificial barriers nor chemicals, but is based on self-control and responsibility. So are natural methods a faith-consistent way of family planning, or a contradiction hidden under the guise of a theological compromise?
Natural family planning and the Church’s teaching – harmony or contradiction?

Do you think that using natural family planning (NFP) methods contradicts the Catholic Church’s principle that “every marital act must remain open to the transmission of life”?
13/09/2025
agriculture children china conspiracy theories consumption crime cuisine culture demography disasters energy entrepreneurship equality eu family geopolitics germany infrastructure international relations israel labor market migration moral values poland psychology public finance real estate resources russia security social care society transport ukraine usa weather
Have a question for society?
Create your own poll and discover what others think!
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.