Law - poll4all.org

Interfaith marriages – freedom of choice or a source of conflict?

Do you think people of different religious beliefs should have full freedom to marry each other?

Interfaith marriages can divide people even more than politics, because they touch what many consider a life foundation – the religion they grew up with. Some see such relationships as a natural result of globalization and freedom of choice, while others warn against clashes of traditions, family pressure, and the risk of children being torn between two doctrines. In the background circulate theories that promoting mixed marriages is a way to “weaken the identity” of certain communities, which only fuels emotions. Are differences in faith an insurmountable barrier, or just a pretext for social fears? Cast your vote and decide which boundaries really matter.

23/11/2025

Interracial marriages – natural diversity or social conflict?

Do you think people of different races should have full freedom to marry each other?

The topic of interracial marriages keeps returning like a boomerang, revealing hidden fears and divisions. For some, it’s an obvious element of a globalized world; for others, a cultural challenge allegedly leading to value clashes. Mixed relationships spark curiosity but also irrational concerns – from claims about the “loss of tradition” to theories that promoting diversity is part of a broader plan of social engineering. In the background remains the simplest question: should love be decided by skin color or only by the free will of two people? Cast your vote and see which way public opinion leans.

23/11/2025

Poland as the 51st state of the USA

Given Poland’s strategic position between Russia and Germany, as well as its natural resources – do you think Poland should become the next U.S. state?

The idea of Poland becoming another U.S. state sounds like a political provocation, but that’s exactly why it attracts attention. Supporters argue that in the face of Russian aggression and Germany’s dominance in the EU, only full inclusion under the American umbrella would guarantee Poland maximum military and economic safety. Critics respond that this would mean abandoning sovereignty and effectively leaving the European system, while some even see it as an attempt to “take over” Poland by foreign interests – a theory that circulates online regularly. Is this a bold vision of the future or a fantasy contradicting basic state independence? Vote and judge for yourself.

23/11/2025

Transgender athletes and competition rules

Should transgender athletes compete with athletes of the gender they identify with?

The debate over the participation of transgender athletes sparks emotions stronger than many political arguments. Supporters of competing according to gender identity speak about equality and dignity, while opponents point to biological advantage and disruption of fair play. In the background lies the question of whether sport should follow social changes or defend classical rules. Some emphasize research on hormonal impact, while others claim this is just a smokescreen and that the real goal is to enforce a cultural revolution – a popular conspiracy theory. Are new categories needed, or is this an attempt to divide people by force? Cast your vote and see how others think.

23/11/2025

Property Tax – Fair or Unfair Way to Tax Wealth?

Do you think that the property tax – calculated based on the market value of real estate – is a reasonable and fair solution?

The property tax, calculated from the current market value of real estate, has sparked debate worldwide for years. Supporters see it as a tool of social justice – those who own more should pay more, which could curb wealth concentration and speculation in the housing market. Critics argue that it unfairly burdens ordinary homeowners who spent decades paying off mortgages and would now face rising costs as property values increase. In many countries, the topic resurfaces amid housing crises and growing inequality. Is the cadastral tax a sensible way to promote social balance, or a form of punishment for owning a home?

08/11/2025

Should there be restaurants exclusively for smokers?

Do you think the law should allow the creation of restaurants intended only for smokers?

The idea of creating restaurants exclusively for smokers periodically returns to public debate. Supporters argue that an adult citizen should have the right to decide for themselves – no one would be forced to visit such a venue. They also point out a paradox: the law allows excluding children from restaurants, yet completely bans smoking. Opponents respond that freedom cannot mean exposing others to harmful smoke, especially employees spending many hours there. In the background remains the question of whether the smoking ban truly protects public health, given that the state still earns billions from tobacco excise taxes. Are “smokers-only” venues an expression of freedom or a nostalgic return to a smoky past?

07/11/2025