Health - Page 3 of 11 - poll4all.org

Does size matter?

Do you think the appearance (and possible size) of intimate body parts affects a person’s sexual attractiveness?

The topic of the appearance and size of intimate body parts has always been controversial. For some, it’s a key element of sexual attractiveness; for others – an artificial complex created by the media and pornography, having nothing to do with real intimacy. In the age of filters, plastic surgery, and the cult of “perfection,” the line between naturalness and body obsession has completely blurred. There are also theories that the erotic industry deliberately shapes our ideas of what is “attractive” to drive profits. Does what’s under the clothes really determine desire? Or is it just an illusion?

06/10/2025

Deposit system

Do you support the introduction of a deposit system for bottles and cans?

The deposit system for bottles and cans is a topic that divides people almost as much as taxes or vaccines. Some see it as a step toward a cleaner planet and more responsible consumption, while others view it as a clever way for the state to extract money under an environmental pretext. Supporters talk about millions of tons of plastic disappearing from forests and streets; opponents point to bureaucracy, queues, and higher prices. There are also questions about who will really profit from it: the environment or large corporations? Is the deposit system a real change for the better, or premium-grade green PR?

01/10/2025

Fine for not wearing seatbelts

Do you think people should be fined for driving without seatbelts, given that cyclists and e-scooter users are not even required to wear helmets?

The debate on penalizing driving without seatbelts once again exposes the hypocrisy of traffic law. Drivers and car passengers face harsh penalties, while cyclists and e-scooter users, who are also at risk of injury, do not even have to wear helmets. Supporters of the current regulations emphasize that the difference lies in speed – a car is a potential one-ton weapon, and seatbelts genuinely save lives. Others argue that if the state cares so much about safety, it should also make helmets mandatory for cyclists and e-scooter enthusiasts. There are also opinions that the whole system is selective and unfair – punish drivers while leaving others unregulated? Is this about protecting citizens, or is it another example of unequal treatment?

24/09/2025

Mandatory helmet and liability insurance for bicycle and e-scooter users?

Should helmets and liability insurance be mandatory for users of e-scooters and bicycles?

The topic of mandatory helmets and liability insurance for bicycles and e-scooters is heating up public opinion. Supporters argue that since cars require seatbelts and insurance, similar rules should apply to other road users as well. Critics, however, warn against bureaucratic absurdities and yet another tax disguised as safety. The fact is that the number of accidents involving e-scooters is rising, and statistics on head injuries are alarming. On the other hand, some suggest that the whole debate is driven by the insurance lobby, eager for millions of new clients. Will such obligations actually improve safety, or rather restrict freedom and mobility? Cast your vote in the poll and see what others think.

24/09/2025

Dangerous dog breeds

In your opinion, what is the best way to solve the problem related to dangerous dog breeds?

The topic of so-called dangerous dog breeds has sparked heated debates and divided society for years. Some demand a total ban on their breeding, while others argue that a dog’s aggression stems solely from human mistakes. The media frequently report tragic biting incidents, fueling fear and leading to political pressure for stricter laws. On the other hand, facts and studies show that even breeds labeled as “fighting dogs” can be gentle if the owner provides proper upbringing. Critics argue that it is not genetics but lack of responsibility that causes tragedies. So are bans the solution, or merely an escape from the real problem? Take part in the poll and share your opinion.

23/09/2025

Natural family planning and the Church’s teaching – harmony or contradiction?

Do you think that using natural family planning (NFP) methods contradicts the Catholic Church’s principle that “every marital act must remain open to the transmission of life”?

Natural family planning has long sparked heated debates because it touches the very heart of Catholic sexual morality. On one hand, the Church teaches that every marital act must remain open to life, which for many means that avoiding intercourse during fertile days is a form of hidden contraception. Critics even argue that NFP is the “Catholic version of the condom” – playing with God and trying to cheat nature. On the other hand, official teaching, especially the encyclical Humanae vitae, emphasizes that NFP is not a sin because it uses neither artificial barriers nor chemicals, but is based on self-control and responsibility. So are natural methods a faith-consistent way of family planning, or a contradiction hidden under the guise of a theological compromise?

13/09/2025