The connections between Mercosur agribusiness owners and Europe spark mixed emotions and raise difficult questions about the true nature of global trade. Critics argue that the EU–Mercosur deal is essentially an agreement with elites of European descent who have controlled South American land and capital for generations. They claim that instead of supporting local farmers, Europe is negotiating with its own “clones,” only operating under a different flag. Supporters respond that this is simply a natural consequence of migration waves from Germany, Italy, Spain, and Eastern Europe that shaped the continent’s social structure. But doesn’t this make globalization look like a closed club of families and roots, where real competition is only an illusion? What’s your view – an elite arrangement or a normal historical process?
Connections between Mercosur agribusiness owners and Europe

How do you think the fact that most owners of the largest agribusinesses in Mercosur countries have European roots (German, Italian, Spanish, Jewish from Eastern Europe) should be interpreted?
13/09/2025
agriculture children china conspiracy theories consumption crime cuisine culture demography disasters energy entrepreneurship equality eu family geopolitics germany infrastructure international relations israel labor market migration moral values poland psychology public finance real estate resources russia security social care society transport ukraine usa weather
Have a question for society?
Create your own poll and discover what others think!
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.