The debate over supplying Ukraine with Tomahawk cruise missiles is heating up politicians and public opinion on both sides of the Atlantic. For some, it’s a logical step in defending an invaded nation and a signal that the West will not back down in the face of Russian blackmail. For others, it’s playing with fire that could turn into a global conflict. The facts are that Tomahawks have a range capable of reaching almost any target in Russia, raising concerns about escalation. Is this the defense of freedom or dangerous boundary-testing in a proxy war? The U.S. has already “unofficially” tested similar scenarios—will it cross the Rubicon this time? Take part in the poll and judge for yourself.
Category: War
War covers surveys on armed conflicts, international security and perceptions of military actions and alliances. This category examines public sentiment toward escalation risks, military support and civilian consequences.



