War – poll4all.org

Should politicians take part in closed-door meetings of the Bilderberg Group?

Should politicians take part in closed-door meetings of the Bilderberg Group?

How, in your opinion, should the annual meetings of the Bilderberg Group, attended by elites from politics, finance, and business, be evaluated?

For decades, the Bilderberg Group has stirred emotions – some see it as an exclusive club of elites discussing the future of the world, others – as a secret center of power above nations. The meetings take place behind closed doors, without media or official records, which only fuels suspicions of backroom deals. Supporters claim it is a forum for free exchange of ideas, while critics argue it’s where bankers and politicians decide global economic and social strategies. The Internet is full of theories linking Bilderberg to the New World Order or global political control. Is it an innocent debate of elites, or the real command center steering the world from behind the scenes?

05/11/2025

American military equipment – alliance or dependence?

Do you think it makes sense to buy modern military equipment from the United States if, without U.S. authorization, the equipment practically loses its combat capabilities?

More and more often, people say that buying American military equipment is not an investment in security, but in dependence. F-35 jets, Patriot systems, or HIMARS launchers are technological masterpieces – yet without U.S. approval, they can turn into expensive scrap metal. Critics ask bluntly: can we speak of sovereignty if it depends on political obedience to the U.S.? Supporters argue that only through cooperation with the United States does Europe gain a real shield against aggression. However, each update, authorization, or repair becomes another link in the chain of control. So, is the American alliance a guarantee of security – or a quiet form of subordination? Take part in the poll and decide which side you’re on.

26/10/2025

US sanctions on Venezuela – aid, pressure, or self-interest?

In your opinion, the economic sanctions imposed by the United States on Venezuela are mainly intended to:

U.S. economic sanctions against Venezuela have sparked heated debate for years – some see them as an attempt to defend democracy, others as a brutal tool of economic pressure. Officially, they aim to support the fight against Nicolás Maduro’s authoritarian regime, yet many now question whether the real goal is oil, geopolitics, and control over South America. Venezuela, with some of the world’s largest oil reserves, has long been a battleground for influence between the U.S., Russia, China, and Iran. Critics argue that sanctions mostly hurt ordinary citizens rather than the ruling elite. So is it really about human rights – or about maintaining dollar dominance and control over resources?

26/10/2025

Ancient underground cities and tunnels

What was the true purpose of the ancient tunnels and underground cities discovered in various parts of the world?

Underground cities and tunnels from China to South America inspire as much awe today as the pyramids or Stonehenge. Where did these vast networks of corridors carved into rock thousands of years ago come from, given that ancient technology shouldn’t have allowed such feats? Some see them as shelters from wars and cataclysms, others as temples of forgotten cults or laboratories of a lost civilization that went underground to survive a global flood. There’s growing talk of their role in the Earth’s energy grid connecting the so-called ley lines, and even of contact with extraterrestrials. Could these tunnels be evidence that our history is completely different from what we were taught?

24/10/2025

Frozen Russian Assets

Is freezing Russian assets abroad and potentially using them for Ukraine’s reconstruction the right course of action?

The freezing of Russian assets abroad and the idea of using them for Ukraine’s reconstruction have stirred strong emotions in politics and economics. Supporters argue it is a moral obligation toward the victims of the war and a way for Russia to pay for the destruction it caused. Opponents warn, however, that such actions could open Pandora’s box – if Russia’s property can be seized today, other countries that fall out of favor with the West could face the same tomorrow. Some even call it a hidden form of economic warfare, while others see it as a prelude to a global redistribution of elite wealth. Is this the beginning of a new financial order or a step toward chaos?

23/10/2025

Tomahawks for Ukraine

Should the United States provide Ukraine with Tomahawk cruise missiles?

The debate over supplying Ukraine with Tomahawk cruise missiles is heating up politicians and public opinion on both sides of the Atlantic. For some, it’s a logical step in defending an invaded nation and a signal that the West will not back down in the face of Russian blackmail. For others, it’s playing with fire that could turn into a global conflict. The facts are that Tomahawks have a range capable of reaching almost any target in Russia, raising concerns about escalation. Is this the defense of freedom or dangerous boundary-testing in a proxy war? The U.S. has already “unofficially” tested similar scenarios—will it cross the Rubicon this time? Take part in the poll and judge for yourself.

22/10/2025