American military equipment – alliance or dependence?

Do you think it makes sense to buy modern military equipment from the United States if, without U.S. authorization, the equipment practically loses its combat capabilities?

More and more often, people say that buying American military equipment is not an investment in security, but in dependence. F-35 jets, Patriot systems, or HIMARS launchers are technological masterpieces – yet without U.S. approval, they can turn into expensive scrap metal. Critics ask bluntly: can we speak of sovereignty if it depends on political obedience to the U.S.? Supporters argue that only through cooperation with the United States does Europe gain a real shield against aggression. However, each update, authorization, or repair becomes another link in the chain of control. So, is the American alliance a guarantee of security – or a quiet form of subordination? Take part in the poll and decide which side you’re on.


agriculture children china conspiracy theories consumption crime cuisine culture demography disasters energy entrepreneurship equality eu family geopolitics germany infrastructure international relations israel labor market migration moral values poland psychology public finance real estate resources russia security social care society transport ukraine usa weather

OTHER POLLS

Have a question for society?
Create your own poll and discover what others think!


    Comments

    Leave a Reply

    Home (English)